Regulating Access to Databases Through Antitrust Law, 2006 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 7 (2006)

نویسندگان

  • Daryl Lim
  • John Marshall
  • DARYL LIM
  • TZE WEI
چکیده

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

After Search Neutrality: Drawing a Line Between Promotion and Demotion

The Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC” or “the commission”) January 3, 2013 decision to close its longstanding investigation of Google brings to a close a flurry of discussion over the possibility that Google could become subject to a “search neutrality” principle in the United States. Although the Commission found against Google on several grounds, it rejected petitions from Google’s critics to...

متن کامل

Welfare Polls: A Synthesis

=706782. 87 See James Salzman & J.B. Ruhl, Currencies and the Commodification of Environmental Law, 53 STAN. L. REV. 607, 616-22 (2000). Reprinted with Permission of New York University School of Law [Vol. 81:1875 H inOnline -81 .Y.U. L. Rev. 190

متن کامل

Antitrust in China 2006

This paper reviews China’s continuing efforts to enact a competition policy (antitrust) law. We focus on three issues: (1) What is the substance of the proposed law, and how does it differ from existing antitrust law in other countries, (2) How will the law be implemented or enforced, and how will those who must implement this law interpret their mandate, and (3) What will be the likely effects...

متن کامل

Contesting anticompetitive actions taken in the name of the state: state action immunity and health care markets.

The so-called state action doctrine is a judicially created formula for resolving conflicts between federal antitrust policy and state policies that seem to authorize conduct that antitrust law would prohibit. Against the background of recent commentaries by the federal antitrust agencies, this article reviews the doctrine and discusses its application in the health care sector, focusing on the...

متن کامل

Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary Between Antitrust Law and Patent Law∗

For over a century, courts and commentators have struggled to find principles that reconcile patent and antitrust law, especially as to patent licensing. We interpret case law and commentary to arrive at three unifying principles for acceptable terms of license. Profit neutrality holds that patent rewards should not depend on the rightholder’s ability to work the patent himself. Derived reward ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016